Are you looking for an answer to the topic “Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now Lance Herndon’s Murder“? We answer all your questions at the website Abettes-culinary.com in category: Top 4620 tips from Abettes-culinary update new. You will find the answer right below.
Keep Reading
The latest attack found in the Fake: Killing Love poll shows a millionaire killing millionaire for millions of people expressing a millionaire his little lover.
Anas Virank was killed in 1996 when his girlfriend died.
So if you want to learn more about scams and killers, we can do that.
Dionne Baugh Wiki
Surname
Dionne Baugh
Age
52
gender
Feminine
Height
–
nationality
American
Married single
single
children
1
divorce
Shaun Nelson
Dionne Baugh Net Worth
Now look at Dionne Baugh Net worth income salary 2021 latest updated report given here.
Total Dionne Baugh Net Worth in 2021 – $1 Million – $5 Million (Approx.)
Total Dionne Baugh Net Worth in 2021 – $1 Million – $5 Million (Approx.)
Dionne Baugh Education
Dionne Baugh finished their High School education with Good Grades. After that Dionne Baugh had done graduation in Bahlor degree in US state university
Dionne Baugh Wikipedia
We included all detaild about Dionne Baugh Wikipedia in full article.
Dionne Baugh RELATIONSHIP
The Dionne Baugh friendship between them now stays strong at this moment. In Dionne Baugh relationship there are no indicators of conflicts or issues. Dionne Baugh still have a passion and respect for their partner that is reciprocal.
Dionne Baugh How Tall, Weight & Body Measurement
Dionne Baugh Height – 5 Foot 8 Inches
Dionne Baugh Weight – 68 KG
Dionne Baugh stands at a great height with decent body measurements. Dionne Baugh has a healthy body weight to match the height.
Dionne Baugh Social Media
During the last few months, Dionne Baugh has earned a lot of attention from Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and YouTube with thousands of dedicated subscribers.
Dionne Baugh FAQs
How old is Dionne Baugh? What is Dionne Baugh’s religion?
What is Dionne Baugh Ethnicity Race?
Where was Dionne Baugh born?
Who is Dionne Baugh dating?
Is Dionne Baugh Married?
What is Dionne Baugh Education?
What is Dionne Baugh’s nationality?
Ex-Lover is Questioned in Millionaire’s Brutal Murder
[su_youtube url=”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GcEjXrhNb4″]
Images related to the topicEx-Lover is Questioned in Millionaire’s Brutal Murder
See some more details on the topic Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now Lance Herndon’s Murder here:
Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now
Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now: Lance Herndon’s Murder. The last attack was found in the survey “fake: killing love” shows a …
Source: www.650.org
Date Published: 2/6/2021
View: 2012
Lance Herndon’s Murder: Dionne Baugh Where Is She Now …
Dionne Baugh pleaded guilty to the murder of ex-lover Lance Herndon, a self-made millionaire of Atlanta. Where is she now? Let’s find out.
Source: ab.com.tc
Date Published: 7/27/2021
View: 2409
Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now
Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now: Lance Herndon’s Murder. The last attack was found in the survey “fake: killing love” …
Source: www.ncertpoint.com
Date Published: 3/17/2021
View: 6449
Dionne Baugh | Murderpedia, the encyclopedia of murderers
Baugh, 44, spent 10 years in prison for the voluntary manslaughter of Roswell millionaire Lance Herndon. She was released in July and is currently serving a …
Source: murderpedia.org
Date Published: 1/11/2022
View: 2958
Lance Herndon’s Murder Dionne Baugh Where Is She Now, Everything To Know On
Dionne Baugh pleaded guilty to the murder of ex-lover Lance Herndon, a self-made Atlanta millionaire. Where is she now? let’s find out
The latest episode of Investigation Discovery’s “Scorned: Love Kills,” titled “The Millionaire Mistress,” chronicled the brutal murder of millionaire Lance Herndon at the hands of his younger lover, Dionne Baugh.
Lance Herndon was killed by his girlfriend in 1996.
So now if you want to know more about this gruesome murder and the killer’s whereabouts, you’ve come to the right place.
Fast Facts:
Name Dionne Baugh Age 52 Gender Female Height – Nationality American Married/Single Single Children 1 Divorce Shaun Nelson
Lance Herndon Murder Wikipedia Bio
Lance Herndon, a self-made millionaire turned bachelor, has died at the age of 41. He was killed by his lover, Dionne Baugh.
When, as a workaholic, he didn’t show up for work one fine day, his family and colleagues worried about him.
So his mother checked him out on August 8, 1996, only to see him lying dead: beaten, bloodied and naked.
According to reports, Lance died from fatal blows to the back, front and right side of his head.
Arrest of Dionne Baugh for the murder of Lance Herndon
Lance Herndon had a long list of suspects, including his former lovers and admirers. However, police eventually turned their attention to his recent partner, Dionne Baugh.
Dionne Baugh, then 27, was involved in an affair with Lance, despite having a husband and daughter.
Upon further investigation, it turned out that Lance wanted to end things with Dionne. Apparently that didn’t go down well with the lady.
In fact, Dionne was seen making a huge scene outside his home and knocking on his door repeatedly just a month before his death. This prompted Lance to call the police to her.
Due to a lack of evidence, Dionne could not initially be arrested. However, the mother-in-law later claimed that Dionne confessed to the murder. Dionne also reportedly admitted to being at Lance’s house the night of the murder.
After this testimony, Dionne was immediately taken into custody.
Upon further investigation, her DNA was also found under Lance’s fingernails.
Therefore, Dionne was charged with the murder of Lance Herndon and sentenced to life imprisonment. But she only served ten years.
Where is Dionne Baugh now?
After serving her time, Dionne Baugh was released in 2011. It is believed that she briefly relocated to Florida and Kansas.
Dionne initially appealed her case. However, to avoid another public court appearance, she pleaded guilty to a reduced charge and served ten years in prison and the next ten years on probation.
After her release, Dionne Baugh has stayed away from media attention and kept a low profile.
Also, she was in the midst of a divorce when she was arrested for Lance’s murder. From this we can conclude that their marriage is long over.
Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now Lance Herndon’s Murder
The latest attack found in the Fake: Killing Love poll shows a millionaire killing millionaire for millions of people expressing a millionaire his little lover.
Anas Virank was killed in 1996 when his girlfriend died.
So if you want to learn more about scams and killers, we can do that.
Dionne Baugh Wiki
Name Dionne Baugh Age 52 Gender Female Height – Nationality American Married/Single Single Children 1 Divorce Shaun Nelson
Murderpedia, the encyclopedia of murderers
Dionne Baugh: Attractive Jamaican native Dionne Baugh made a living in Atlanta, Georgia. Despite their recent divorce, things have been going well. Dionne had a good job and a rich boyfriend. She had caught the eye of local businessman Lance Herndon and the two were dating. But Lance was a womanizer and Dionne had caught him with another woman at least once. In fact, she was arrested for making a scene outside his home. Then, in August 1996, Lance was found dead in his bedroom. Police went to Dionne, who admitted seeing Lance the night before but claimed not to know about the murder. DNA linking Dionne to the crime scene would prove otherwise. The police charged her with murder. She was tried and convicted, but controversial statements led to a new trial. The second jury deadlocked, giving Dionne the chance for a third trial. Dionne decided to strike a deal. She pleaded guilty to first degree murder and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. 1996 Roswell millionaire killer released from prison Dionn Baugh spent 10 years in prison for the voluntary manslaughter of Roswell millionaire Lance Herndon and nearly a decade as fodder for news outlets across the country, Dionne Baugh is a free woman. Baugh, 44, served 10 years in prison for the voluntary manslaughter of Roswell millionaire Lance Herndon. She was released in July and is currently serving a 10-year probationary period, said Kristen Stancil, a spokeswoman for the Georgia Department of Corrections. “I’m glad she’s out and hopefully she’s okay,” said a relative, who asked not to be named. The relative is no longer in touch with Baugh, but could not escape the sensational unfolding of the case from Herndon’s death in 1996 to the publication in 2007 of a true crime book detailing Baugh’s trial from murder conviction to pleading guilty. “I heard about the book but couldn’t read it,” the relative said. “It was too painful.” In August 1996, Herndon, 41, was found dead at his home in Roswell by his mother. He had been beaten to death with an object that was never found. There were no fingerprints at the scene and no witnesses, and it was more than a year before police arrested Baugh in January 1998. Baugh, who had a husband and young daughter in her native Jamaica, had become Herndon’s mistress after she snagged an invitation to his birthday party. At the time, Baugh was a petite, trim 29-year-old with a slight accent who was studying finance at Georgia State University while also serving as MARTA’s executive secretary. She owned a home in Norcross and, according to prosecutors, had a penchant for the finer things. Herndon seemed able, and eventually willing, to provide them. It was Atlanta’s golden era—as host of the Olympics and emerging jewel of the New South—and Herndon, finding his fortune in computer consulting, embodied the city’s spirit. Baugh was reportedly one of several women with whom he shared the perks of his success, including access to credit cards and luxury cars. But after a few months of relationship, while spying on him with another woman, she got into a jealous rage. Herndon filed criminal charges but would not live to see the scheduled court appearance. In 2001, a jury convicted Baugh of murder, which carried a life sentence. Two years later, the Georgia Supreme Court vacated the conviction on appeal based on improper testimony by a police officer. A second jury deadlocked after a two-week trial. In September 2004, Baugh was scheduled for a third trial but pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of first degree manslaughter. Baugh remained behind bars, most recently in the medium-security Pulaski State Penitentiary in Hawkinsville, but her story picked up steam again. In 2005, the case was featured in an episode of “Snapped,” Oxygen’s true-crime series about female killers. And in 2007, Redbone: Money, Malice, and Murder in Atlanta by Ron Stodghill (Amistad/HarperCollins, $26) hit bookstores. Baugh’s relatives hope that if they are released, the families – both Baughs and Herndons – will be able to put the devastating crime behind them. “She is in my prayers,” the relative said, “along with everyone else involved.” J’can woman gets 20 years for lover’s murder – Pleds surprise guilty September 29, 2004 DIONNE BAUGH, 35, a Jamaican resident in Atlanta, Georgia, was sentenced to 20 years in prison on Monday, September 27 after surprisingly pleading guilty to the 1996 killing of her lover, Lance Herdon, a wealthy Roswell, Georgia businessman. Baugh pleaded guilty to one charge of first degree manslaughter and was sentenced in Fulton County Court in Atlanta to 10 years in prison and 10 years probation. Baugh would have automatically faced a life sentence if she was convicted of murder. She was originally convicted of murder by a Fulton jury in 2000, but that conviction was later overturned due to improper hearsay testimony from a police officer. Lead prosecutor Clint Rucker had said that Baugh, then married to a pilot, was chasing Herndon’s wealth and fumed when he tried to take back his Mercedes and credit card. Baugh’s attorneys, Tony Axam and Don Samuel, argued that Herndon had multiple lovers and financial problems, giving many others a motive to kill him. During her second trial last year, Baugh’s attorneys managed to convince some jurors that there was reasonable doubt and a mistrial was declared. The third trial was scheduled to begin on Monday September 27, 2004. Herndon was the chief executive officer of Access Inc., a computer consulting firm. He had such influential friends that the Roswell Police Department received calls from federal law enforcement officers offering to help solve the case. Awards Herndon has worked for companies such as Coca-Cola, NationsBank and the Atlanta Committee for the Olympic Games and has received awards from former President Bill Clinton. He was found on August 7, 1996 in the bedroom of his upscale home with his skull crushed. At last year’s court hearing, Jackie Herndon, the victim’s mother, told the court that she discovered her son’s battered body. She attended court every day and sat quietly within sight of the woman prosecutors insist on slaughtering her son. Unable to post bail, which was set at half a million dollars, Baugh remained incarcerated pending a third trial. Harrison Herndon, 12, wanted to attend the trial to learn more about why he no longer had a father, but the family decided he shouldn’t hear the gruesome details, prosecutors said. The boy, who has lived with his mother since Herndon’s divorce, was five when he last saw his father alive. Prosecutors described the case as a tale of wealth, sex and greed that ended in a bloodbath. Herndon was the owner and founder of a multimillion-dollar company and was named Minority Entrepreneur of the Year by two presidents, prosecutors said. His computer consulting firm, Access Inc., developed the software for Fulton County’s 911 system, said Clint Rucker, the lead prosecutor in the case. There were no witnesses to the killing. The murder weapon was never found and there is no bloodstain. Prosecutors pieced together “nuggets” that they insisted proved Baugh was the killer. Baugh had no alibi, her DNA was found under Herndon’s fingernails, and she charged $3,000 worth of furniture to Herndon’s credit card hours after the murder, Rucker said. georgia v Baugh: Did a despised lover murder a successful entrepreneur? Court TV, May 17, 2004 Was a successful Georgia entrepreneur murdered by one of his many lovers, a woman who was furious that he was trying to end their affair? Or were there leads to other potential suspects–leads that police, in their haste to pursue an innocent suspect, ignored? An Atlanta jury had already found Dionne Baugh guilty of murder — but when her conviction was overturned on appeal, the 35-year-old defendant was tried again in an Atlanta courtroom in October 2003. A rising star Lance Herndon had established a reputation as one of Atlanta’s rising business stars. His company, Access Inc., was a computer consulting firm that won multi-million dollar contracts with such notable clients as the City of Atlanta and NationsBank. The 41-year-old New York native received a National Service Award from then-President George Bush in the White House in 1988. Former President Bill Clinton praised him for his business acumen during his tenure. Atlanta Mayor Bill Campbell selected Herndon as one of the city’s business leaders to accompany the mayor on a 1995 trade mission to South Africa. Herndon, an African American, was known in this minority community for his philanthropic endeavors. But Lance Herndon had a dark side. Those who knew him well acknowledge that the three-divorce entrepreneur – his last divorce was last January – had two major weaknesses. Herndon liked women and was often involved with several women at the same time. And Herndon loved spending money on himself and the women in his life. After his death, Access Inc. was found to be essentially broke and Herndon had already borrowed heavily against a large line of credit he had set up at a local bank. The Relationship Herndon met Dionne Baugh in April 1996 and quickly began an affair. Baugh, 27 and then married, was a naturalized American citizen originally from Jamaica. Her husband, Shaun Nelson, was a pilot for Air Jamaica and lived in the island nation with the couple’s young daughter, Amanda, while Baugh stayed in Atlanta to complete her college education. She worked as an executive assistant for MARTA, the Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority. According to witnesses, Herndon wanted to end his relationship with Baugh even though she wanted to continue seeing him. Herndon had actually called the police a month before he was killed. On July 10, Baugh allegedly made a scene outside his home and repeatedly knocked on his door after reportedly seeing Lance inside with another woman. A police officer who responded to the call turned Baugh away, but she returned early the next morning. Police arrested her on a misdemeanor and a charge of criminal trespassing. Although the couple continued to see each other after the July 10 incident, prosecutors allege that Lance Herndon chose to end his relationship with Dionne. But he continued to give Baugh money on a regular basis and allowed her full-time use of his Mercedes. On August 8 – the day Lance Herndon’s body was discovered – Baugh was due to appear in court on charges of criminal trespassing. However, Herndon had reportedly promised Baugh that he would appear with her and ask that the charges be dismissed. Crime Scene Herndon was found dead at his home in an upscale suburb of Roswell, Georgia, on Thursday morning, August 8, 1996. Herndon’s body was discovered by his mother, Jackie, after his employees who worked in his basement office became concerned if he didn’t show up for work and didn’t call back. Lance Herndon’s naked body was found partially covered with a sheet on his waterbed in the home’s master bedroom. His head had been crushed by repeated blows from a blunt instrument. Although the murder weapon itself was never found, the coroner later concluded that it was likely a large crescent wrench. There were no defensive wounds on the body, suggesting the victim was ambushed. Herndon was spotted lying on his back with his arms crossed over his chest, which is the position he usually slept in, according to people close to him. His wallet and several credit cards were found untouched on a dresser in the bedroom, although the shirt and pants the victim had been wearing the previous night were missing. A bloody pillowcase, which the perpetrator may have used to wipe off blood after the attack, was discovered hidden in the toilet in the main bathroom. Perhaps the most unusual thing about Lance Herndon’s bedroom was the fact that all of his alarm clocks were unplugged. Herndon, who usually got up at 4:00 or 4:30 every morning, set three alarm clocks. In addition, the phone that was next to the victim’s bed was also unplugged. Because the heater in Herndon’s waterbed prevented his body temperature from dropping below 87 degrees, the exact time of his death could not be determined. However, the coroner who performed his autopsy estimated that Lance Herndon had been dead for around six to eight hours when his body was discovered just after 10:00 a.m. The Investigation Early in their investigation, the police began to suspect Baugh of murder, but the case against her was too weak to warrant an arrest. Despite this, the police kept a close eye on her for the next year. Authorities first went to question Baugh hours after the discovery of Herndon’s body, but no one answered her repeated knocks on the door. After talking to a neighbor, they left. But the neighbor later told them that immediately after the police left, Dionne Baugh had come to her house to find out what they wanted. According to her neighbor, Baugh said she was in the shower when authorities knocked on her door – which the neighbor found hard to believe, considering Baugh was wearing a business suit, had dry hair and had full makeup on during the day. high. Baugh then got into her car and drove away. Her neighbor notified police that she had just left, and they went to Baugh’s house to await her return. About 20 minutes after they arrived, Baugh returned home and reportedly collapsed and became hysterical after allegedly learning of Lance Herndon’s death. According to the police, she didn’t shed real tears. In her interview with police later that afternoon – and in a subsequent videotaped interview at Roswell P.D. Nine days later, on August 17, Dionne Baugh denied knowing anything about Lance Herndon’s death. She told authorities that she drove her husband and daughter, who were visiting from Jamaica, to the airport on the evening of August 7 and then returned home. She said Herndon made a brief visit to her home sometime between 9:00 p.m. and 10:30 p.m. the night before Lance’s body was discovered, and that he brought her his IBM ThinkPad laptop, which he sometimes lent her. Herndon then left her home, she told police. Despite repeated questioning, Dionne Baugh stuck to her story that she never went to Lance Herndon’s house the night he was killed. She also claimed that her relationship with Herndon is solid and that she and Lance are genuinely in love. But authorities found their version of events did not match what others told them. Finally, in January 1998, the police got the breakthrough they were looking for. Dionne Baugh was in the process of divorcing her husband, and police learned that Baugh had spoken to her mother-in-law, Barbara Nelson, a few weeks after the murder. During that conversation, Baugh reportedly admitted to her mother-in-law that she had indeed been at Lance Herndon’s house the night he was killed – although she had told police she was not present that evening. Baugh was arrested and charged with malicious murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, double larceny by takeaway and financial transaction card fraud. If convicted of murder, she faced life imprisonment. The Prosecution’s Case According to the prosecution’s theory, Lance Herndon had grown weary of Dionne Baugh and wanted to end their relationship. Authorities allege Herndon told some of his friends that he was tired of Baugh’s controlling, obsessive behavior and wanted to get rid of them. But by August 7, prosecutors said, Dionne Baugh realized her days with Lance Herndon were numbered — and they say the evidence suggests she wasn’t a woman to be trifled with. Prosecutors also believe the combination of anger and greed was fueled by Baugh’s Aug. 8 court appearance. They suspect the last straw may have been Baugh learning that Herndon no longer intended to fulfill his promise to appear in court and drop the charges against her. According to the state’s theory, Dionne Baugh joined Lance Herndon sometime around midnight on August 7 or 8. They believe the couple had sex and that Baugh sat over a dozing or unsuspecting Herndon and hit him in the head with a large, heavy object. Prosecutors say Herndon kept a large crescent key at his home, but it was not found after the murder. After killing Lance Herndon, prosecutors said, Dionne showered Baugh to wash off the victim’s blood and then took Herndon’s jewelry and one of his credit cards. They said she then unplugged the victim’s alarm clocks so they wouldn’t still go off and draw attention when Herdon’s employees got to work around 7:30 a.m. Only someone familiar with Herndon’s sleeping and working habits — like Baugh, prosecutors say — would have known to turn off the clocks. Several of Lance’s confidants say Herndon usually slept on his back with his arms crossed across his chest, in the same position he was in when his body was discovered? But the coroner claims there’s no way Herndon could have been in that position after such a brutal attack. As such, authorities suspect that someone familiar with Lance’s sleeping habits should have put him in that position to make it appear that Herndon was murdered while he slept. Prosecutors also say that before leaving the house, Baugh went downstairs to Access Inc.’s offices, where she used Lance’s IBM ThinkPad. Although he had sometimes loaned the laptop to Baugh in the past, his colleagues claimed the meticulous Herndon never allowed IBM to leave his office without the protective case, but the case was later discovered in an office storage closet. Dionne Baugh openly admitted to police that she had the computer, claiming that Lance brought it to her home on the night of August 7. She also claimed that Herndon would often lend it to her without a case. Neither Lance Herndon’s jewelry nor the murder weapon were ever found. Police suspect Baugh disposed of the Crescent Key and possibly the jewelry as well when she left her home on August 8 after learning authorities wanted to speak to her. But the credit card that prosecutors claim Baugh stole from Lance Herndon resurfaced. The defendant used it on the morning of August 8 — before Herndon’s body was even discovered — to phone to order a display case for her home, which cost nearly $3,000. Prosecutors also point to forensic evidence they say proves Baugh committed the heinous murder. Samples of the defendant’s head and pubic hair matched similar hair found in Herndon’s bed. DNA found under one of Herdon’s fingernails was identical to Dionne Herndon’s DNA. Two crumpled packs of gum found in the Herndon home resembled packs of gum later found in the defendant’s purse. And a piece of foliage found on Herndon’s bedroom rug appeared to match a similar piece of foliage found on the Mercedes-Baugh driver’s floorboard. Police know Lance Herndon was at his home at 9pm. on August 7th. His ex-wife Jeannine dropped off Herndon’s mother, who was staying the night with her grandson. Telephone records show he made or received calls intermittently throughout the evening – including two calls from the defendant and one he made to Baugh at 10:53pm. Defendants’ allegation that Lance Herndon arrived at their home at least 20 minutes away that evening between 9:00 am and 10:30 pm was seemingly impossible. All of this evidence, prosecutors say, proves Dionne Baugh is a greedy woman who maliciously murdered Lance Herndon. The case for Dionne Baugh’s defense Attorneys are quick to point out that most of the evidence against their client is purely circumstantial. While they are willing to admit that Baugh has not always been entirely honest with authorities, they insist that prosecutors cannot shoulder the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Dionne Baugh is, in fact, Lance Herndon’s killer. Although police investigators suspected that Dionne Baugh tried to evade them on August 8, the defense notes that Baugh was actually quite cooperative. After speaking to her neighbor and learning that authorities wanted to question her, Baugh called the number left by police from her cell phone after she left her home. When she returned home to find the police waiting there, Baugh agreed to speak to them and even allowed them to quickly search her home. She also voluntarily told authorities she was in possession of Lance Herndon’s IBM ThinkPad and promptly turned it over to them, though they probably didn’t even know of its existence. The defense also dismisses the prosecution’s theory that Dionne Baugh was furious with Lance Herndon for wanting to dump her. They say the lovers have continued their relationship after the July 10 incident in which Baugh was arrested outside Lance’s home. As defense attorneys note, Herndon bailed Baugh the next day, helped Baugh find an attorney, and even called the police to try to have the charges dropped. In addition to his promise to attend the Aug. 8 court hearing on her behalf, the defense alleges that his actions do not indicate that Lance Herndon was attempting to distance himself from Dionne Baugh. They also disagree with the prosecution’s claim that the forensic evidence is strong evidence against Baugh. According to the defense, crime scene technicians also found hair that matched neither Baugh nor Lance Herndon, hair that never matched anyone. Baugh’s attorneys also allege that some of the other evidence, such as the gum wrappers and leafy material that may have been left behind by Herndon’s killer, is far too general to be specifically linked to their client. In addition, Lance Herndon’s blood was never found on the defendants’ clothing, in their home, in the Mercedes she was driving, or on the IBM ThinkPad that she voluntarily gave to police. The DNA found under Lance Herndon’s fingernails has definitely been identified as that of Dionne Baugh, but the defense insists this shouldn’t surprise anyone given the victim and defendant had sex on a regular basis. And even if Dionne Baugh went to Herndon’s house on the night of August 7 and had sex with him, that doesn’t mean she killed him or was present at his death. The defense also says the credit card Baugh used was one of many that Herndon gave to girlfriends he was dating. Baugh claims that she and Lance viewed the furniture in question together a few months earlier and that he gave her his permission to incriminate it. Herndon had also given Baugh another credit card earlier in their affair. The defense also argues that their client wasn’t stupid enough to charge nearly $3,000 to a dead man’s credit card the morning after his brutal assassination. According to the defense, there are many other people the police could have focused their investigation on as possible suspects. Kathi Collins, Lance Herndon’s “main” girlfriend, was the woman Baugh saw with Herndon on July 10. Collins claims she was at a restaurant with her niece the night Herndon was killed, but police never bothered to question the niece to see if she could be Collins’ alibi substantiate Another of Herndon’s friends, Talana Carroway, had a boyfriend named “Jazz” Williams who once had financial dealings with Lance. Williams may have been jealous of Herndon, the defense charged, and a car similar to Carroway’s (but driven by a man) was found in Herndon’s exclusive subdivision by one of his neighbors around 4:45 a.m. on the morning of August 8 seen. Herndon had once been a partner at an Atlanta nightclub called The Vixen Club. But the partnership had ended in litigation, and Herndon’s ex-wife noted that her husband had “many enemies”. In addition to his lavish and spacious Roswell home/office, police have been told that Lance Herndon may have had a private “secret” apartment in downtown Atlanta. But the police never checked this apartment or even checked whether it existed or not. The day before the murder, one of Herndon’s contract employees was overheard making threats about Herndon. Norvelle Harris was involved in a dispute over salary payments, which Harris claimed Herndon owed him. While it’s possible that none of these leads would have led to Lance Herndon’s killer, Dionne Baugh’s attorneys insist that police were required to investigate them but are neglecting to do so in their rush to reach a verdict against Baugh have. The same sloppiness infected this entire case, the defense claims — a case prosecutors simply don’t have enough evidence to prove. The First Verdict On April 17, 2001, the jury found Baugh guilty on all six counts. Meanwhile, while the jury was deliberating, defense attorney Gere Quinn filed a motion for a trial, accusing DA Clint Rucker of not being licensed to practice law in Georgia. The allegation was true — Rucker’s license to practice law had been suspended for failing to pay his attorney’s fees. Rucker claimed the non-payment was an accident and said he was embarrassed by the situation. Judge Jerry Baxter contested the trial after a hearing on the matter. Baugh was sentenced to life in prison, but that changed when her attorneys successfully appealed her case. On July 10, 2003, the Georgia Supreme Court found that lead investigator William Anastasio’s testimony had been erroneously admitted from hearsay at the trial. Anastasio had been allowed to testify to him about statements made by Herndon’s employees and girlfriends, as well as by Baugh’s mother-in-law, and to compare those statements with information provided by the defendant. The Verdict On November 8, 2003, four days after deliberations began, the judge declared a mistrial after the jury claimed they were “hopelessly deadlocked.” The case is expected to be retried sometime in the first half of 2004. Dionne Baugh is currently out on $500,000 bail. Georgia Baugh Supreme Court v. State No. S03A0473. July 10, 2003 Donald F. Samuel, William Charles Lea, Garland, Samuel & Loeb, P.C., Tony L. Axam, Axam, Adams & Secret, P.A., Atlanta, for the applicant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Attorney, Anna Elizabeth Green, Asst. Dist. Atty., Bettieanne C. Hart, Deputy Dist. Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney. Gen., Madonna Marie Heinemeyer, Asst. Atty Gen., Atlanta, for respondent. Appellant Dionne Andrea Baugh is appealing the verdict against her after a jury found her guilty of malicious murder, takeaway larceny and financial transaction card fraud in connection with the death of Lance Herndon. 1. The victim’s mother found him in his bed after not being seen in his office. His head was bleeding and their efforts to revive him were unsuccessful. The coroner who performed the autopsy testified that the victim received a single, non-fatal blow to the back of the head, which may have disoriented him, and multiple blows to the front and right side of his face, cutting all facial bones inward and causes inwardly shattered death. When the coroner produced a wrench identified by the victim’s housekeeper as similar to the one on a household counter before the victim’s death and has since been missing, the coroner testified that the wrench could have inflicted the fatal blows. The DNA found under the victim’s fingernails was identified as that of the victim and that of the applicant. A forensic expert testified that two scalp hairs and one pubic hair taken from the victim’s naked body were sufficiently similar to the samples received from the applicant to suggest that they could have come from the applicant. A blood spatter expert testified that the attacker was lying on the bed at the time the wounds were inflicted and may have been sitting over the victim. The state also presented evidence that the applicant, one of several of the victim’s lovers, had been arrested a month earlier for criminal trespassing outside the victim’s home and that the court date for the prosecution was the day the victim was found dead became. While the complainant told police that the victim had visited her at her home the night before he was found dead, phone records and witnesses who spoke to the victim, the records show, indicated that he was too was in his house at that time. Nine days after the victim’s killing, the police, during a search of the applicant’s purse, found several documents awaiting the victim’s signature. One document stated that the car the applicant drove had been bought by the victim and in the event of his death the title was to be given to the applicant; another was an alleged agreement between the applicant and the victim, acknowledging the existence of their romantic relationship and stating that if the applicant stayed in the relationship until July 1998, the car would belong to the applicant; The third unsigned document was the victim’s alleged summary of the circumstances surrounding the applicant’s criminal trespassing and his desire to have the charges dropped. A laptop missing from the victim’s office at his home and valued at $3,500 was found in the applicant’s possession without the carrying case, which the victim insisted on using when it was borrowed. There was also evidence that the applicant, who gave the name Dionne Herndon, used a credit card in the victim’s name to purchase furniture on the day the victim was found dead. The applicant submits that the circumstantial evidence presented by the State was insufficient to justify her conviction. [T]he proper rule for determining the sufficiency of evidence in convictions based solely on circumstantial evidence is that questions of reasonableness are generally to be decided by the jury that has heard the evidence and when the jury has the authority to determine that the evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to rule out any reasonable hypothesis other than guilt, the appeals court will not challenge that finding unless the guilty verdict is not legally tenable. [citation]. Roper v. State, 263 Ga. 201(1), 429 S.E.2d 668 (1993). “Having reviewed the evidence [in this case] in a light favorable to prosecution, we conclude that the evidence is sufficient to have authorized the jury to determine that the State has rejected all reasonable hypotheses other than that of the guilt of the Defendant barred, and to have, every reasonable examination of the facts justified finding the Defendant guilty without a reasonable doubt. Jackson vs. Virginia, 443 US 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).” ID card. 2. Citing Woodard v. State, 269 Ga. 317(2), 496 S.E.2d 896 (1998), the applicant alleges that the trial court erred in allowing the lead investigating officer to testify on the substance of the extrajudicial statements made by five witnesses (two employees of the victim, two of the victim’s former girlfriends and the applicant’s former mother-in-law) who had been subpoenaed by the state and testified before the detective’s subpoena. The applicant also alleges that the investigator’s testimony amounted to witnessing the final issue in the case and giving an inappropriate testimony of opinion. After the detective had recited what a witness had said in her extrajudicial testimony, the detective was asked what the applicant had said in her testimonies to the police on the same subject, repeatedly showing an inconsistency between the applicant’s testimony and that of others witnesses. In Woodard, 320, 496 S.E.2d 896, we pointed out that a witness’ prior consistent testimony is admissible in court “only if (1) the veracity of a witness’ testimony has been challenged in court; (2) the witness is present at the hearing; and (3) the witness is available for cross-examination.” See also Coburn v. State, 252 Ga. App. 315(4c), 555 SE2d 750 (2001); Astudillo v. State, 244 Ga.App. 612, 536 SE2d 271 (2000); Phillips v. State, 241 Ga.App. 764, 766, 527 SE2d 604 (2000); Jenkins v. State, 235 Ga.App. 53(1), 508 S.E.2d 710 (1998). We went on to say that “the accuracy of [a] witness is questioned to permit the introduction of a previous consistent testimony only when positive charges of recent forgery, undue influence, or undue motive are raised during cross-examination.” Woodard, supra , 269 Ga. at 320, 496 S.E.2d 896. See also Mancill v. State, 274 Ga. 465(2), 554 S.E.2d 477 (2001). When there are no allegations of recent invention or undue influence or motive for cross-examination, “the previous consistent testimony is hearsay evidence improperly admitted to enhance the witness’s credibility in the eyes of the jury.” ” Woodard, supra, 269 Ga. at 321, 496 S.E.2d 896. In the Bar case, the five witnesses testified and were cross-examined before the investigating detective testified. During the cross-examination of four of these witnesses, the defense did not suggest that the witness’ testimony in court was recent fabrication or the product of improper motive or influence. As in the Woodard case, the hearsay testimonies were introduced during direct questioning of the investigating officer and were not used to restore the credibility of the maker of the previous consistent testimony after the accuracy of the maker’s testimony had been challenged in court. Instead, the State used the prior consistent testimony of the witnesses to indict the defendant by presenting to the jury, through a witness, the inconsistencies between the applicant’s extrajudicial testimony to the police and the extrajudicial testimony of others. Since prior consistent testimony is admissible only “to refute an allegation that a witness was motivated or influenced to testify falsely, or that [her] testimony is a recent invention” (Woodard, supra, 269 Ga. at 320, 496 S.E. 2d 896) and the veracity of four of the witnesses was not positively challenged, the witnesses’ previous consistent testimonies were purely hearsay and inadmissible to corroborate the witnesses or enhance their credibility before the jury. Id., at 320, 496 S.E.2d 896. See also Astudillo v. State, supra, 244 Ga.App. 612, 536 SE2d 271; Phillips v. State, above, 241 Ga.App. at 766, 527 S.E.2d 604. The question then arises whether the error was harmful. We have often said that the erroneous admission of hearsay is a harmless error when legally admissible evidence of the same fact is introduced. See e.g. B. Fields v. State, 270 Ga. 641(8), 514 S.E.2d 416 (1999). However, this reasoning does not apply where the hearsay is the prior consistent testimony of a witness whose veracity has not been challenged. This is because the nature of a previous consistent testimony is that it repeats what the witness has already testified to. When the hearsay is a prior consistent testimony of a witness, erroneously admitting the witness’s hearsay testimony is a reversible error “when it seems likely that the hearsay contributed to the guilty verdict.” Woodard, supra, 269 Ga. at 324, 496 S.E.2d 896. As far as Abrams v. State, 272 Ga. 63(2), 525 S.E.2d 86 (2000) and Carter v. State, 238 Ga. App. 708, 711, 520 S.E.2d 15 (1999), consider the erroneous admission of a previous consistent statement to be a harmless error, because the witness testified in court about the same events, they are overruled. After reviewing the trial record in the bar case, we conclude that the erroneous admission of the previous consistent statements constituted a harmful error. The state’s case was based solely on circumstantial evidence and credibility, and the improper support of the state’s witnesses “added critical weight to the state’s case.” See Phillips v. State, 241 Ga.App. 764, 767, 527 SE2d 604 (2000). Furthermore, several of the previous consistent statements contradicted a key point of the applicant’s testimony to the police – the victim’s whereabouts shortly before his assassination. Compare Robinson v. State, 246 Ga. App. 576(5), 541 S.E.2d 660 (2000), which noted that the erroneous admission of earlier consistent statements identifying the defendant as one of those who assaulted and robbed the victim was unlikely to have contributed to the verdict, since the defendant only claimed that it was his co-defendant who carried the gun and hit the victim. Given our reversal of the conviction, the remaining errors listed need not be addressed as they are unlikely to be repeated at a retrial. judgment overturned. FOOTNOTES . The crimes occurred in the early hours of August 8, 1996. On February 3, 1998, the Fulton County grand jury returned a true indictment, convicting the plaintiff of malicious murder, felony murder (aggravated assault), aggravated assault and theft by Charges included taking a laptop computer from the victim, stealing jewelry from the victim and fraud with financial transaction cards. The applicant’s jury trial began on April 9, 2001 and ended on April 17, when the jury returned a guilty verdict on all charges. The trial court sentenced the applicant on 20 April to life imprisonment for malicious murder, a concurrent five-year term of imprisonment for theft by takeaway and a concurrent two-year term of imprisonment for fraud with financial transaction cards. The felony murder conviction was vacated by operation of law (Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369(4), 434 S.E.2d 479 (1993)), and the aggravated assault conviction was effectively merged with the malicious murder conviction. Id., at Div. 5. The trial court merged the two thefts by combining convictions into one after finding that all property was taken from one victim. On May 2, 2001, the applicant filed a request for a new procedure and on August 8, 22 and 23 and on September 10, 2002 amendments to it. The trial court denied the motion for a new trial on September 18, 2002 and the amended motion for a new trial on December 4, 2002. An appeal was filed on September 24, 2002 and the appeal was heard in that court on December 6 noted. A hearing was held on April 14, 2003. During the cross-examination of the applicant’s ex-mother-in-law, defense counsel suggested that the witness had only told the police about the statement she had made to her when the applicant and the witness’ son were going through a divorce. This was an indication that the witness’ testimony in court and her previous consistent testimony were the result of the witness’s animus towards the applicant as a result of the divorce proceedings. BENHAM, justice. All judges agree.
Dionne Baugh Dionne Baugh The victim
Roswell millionaire Lance Herndon, 41.
Related searches to Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now Lance Herndon’s Murder
Information related to the topic Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now Lance Herndon’s Murder
Here are the search results of the thread Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now Lance Herndon’s Murder from Bing. You can read more if you want.
You have just come across an article on the topic Dionne Baugh Wikipedia Biography , Where Is She Now Lance Herndon’s Murder. If you found this article useful, please share it. Thank you very much.